Incompatible Drawing ReviewCatch conflicts
Catch conflicts
before the field does.
Cross-checks drawings, standards, and constructability logic across disciplines, then prices what each conflict costs if it reaches site.
Sample Project DashboardKnowledge & Documents
Sample Project › Compliance CheckAI-assistedManualRules 3Audit log 4
A-201 — Level 2 Floor Plan.pdfAI markup85%
Compliance — Level 2 / code & spec▶ Run all
AI-assisted. Every rule is checked against A-201 by sourcing the drawing. Anything uncertain is flagged. Pillarix never silently guesses.
03Concrete cover ≥ 30 mmQueued
Rule source · CSA A23.1 Table 17 · Spec 03 30 00How Pillarix checked — 3 questions sourced from the drawingWhat cover is specified at the slab section?
Is cover dimensioned at every slab edge?
Does the spec exposure class match?
6 Checks2 Compliant3 Need attention0 Confirmed
The workflow
Drawings in. Conflicts out.
Input
Drawings across every discipline
Standards and specifications
Schedules and prior submittals
Agentic workflow
1Register each sheet and detection
2Cross-check geometry and callups
Consistent: pass3Constructability logic
Conflict: flag4Confidence check
Uncertain: hold for review5Price the consequence
Cost and schedule impactOutput
Findings register with severity
Sheet-level references for each conflict
Cost and schedule consequence
RFI-ready detail, drafted to send
01Rule-book
The rule-book derives itself.
Pillarix turns the project scope, specification, and code into concrete, checkable rules, each linked to its CSI section and code clause. Toggle any rule on or off; the ones left on run automatically on every compliance check.
Compliance rule-bookChecked automatically on every compliance run in this project
Concrete cover ≥ 30 mm (interior members)Check dimensioned cover to reinforcement against CSA A23.1 Table 17 for all interior, non-exposed members.Scope · CSI 03 30 00 · CSA A23.1:19 Table 17
Egress door clear width ≥ 850 mmVerify scheduled clear width and swing direction for every egress door per OBC 3.4.3.Scope · CSI 08 11 00 · OBC 3.4
Corridor ceiling finish must be Class AFlag any exit-access ceiling finish with a flame-spread rating above 25. Never guess a rating.Scope · CSI 09 51 00 · OBC 3.1.13
02Source
Checked against the sheet, not guessed.
Every rule becomes questions answered by reading the drawing itself. Each answer cites the note, dimension, or detail it came from, so the verdict is auditable line by line.
03Concrete cover ≥ 30 mmNeeds review
Rule source · CSA A23.1 Table 17 · Spec 03 30 00 §2.4How Pillarix checked · 3 questions sourced from the drawing✓
What cover is specified at the typical slab section?40 mm to bottom reinforcement · A-201 · General Note 4
Meets✕
Is cover dimensioned at every slab edge and opening?Slab edge reads 25 mm, below the minimum · A-201 · grid E
Fails✓
Does the spec exposure class match the 30 mm rule?Exposure class N (interior), consistent · Spec 03 30 00 §2.4
Meets03Audit log
Every check, source, and flag, on the record.
Each verdict is logged with how it was reached: sourced from the drawing, assumed from context, or flagged for your review. The log tracks model accuracy against your own confirmed checks, so you can watch it improve as you work.
Audit log · every check, source, and flag
Model accuracy on your projectsVerdicts vs. your reviewed checks across 23 sheets. ↑ 5 pts since you started confirming results.
AllSourcedAssumedFlaggedUnverified
SourcedCover check (03 30 00) — read 40 mm to bottom bars at the typical slab section and compared it against the 30 mm CSA A23.1 minimum.Division 03 · meets rule
Flagged for youSlab-edge cover at grid E reads 25 mm — below the 30 mm minimum. Flagged for your review.Division 03 · needs review
SourcedEgress doors (08 11 00) — 900 mm clear width sourced from the door schedule; swings checked against corridor 200.Division 08 · meets rule
AssumedExit-access designation — corridor 200 assumed to be required exit access from the Level 2 egress plan.Division 09 · assumption